Saudi Arabia, as the newly-appointed host of the 2034 Men’s World Cup in soccer, has announced ambitious plans for the event. These include constructing or refurbishing 15 stadiums, developing a futuristic city, and expanding airports to accommodate the influx of athletes, coaches, and spectators. However, such extensive construction projects are expected to result in significant greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing materials, operating machinery, and powering new infrastructure. Andrew Zimbalist, an economics professor, criticized the environmental impact of these plans, emphasizing the wastefulness of emitting large amounts of carbon and depleting valuable resources. He suggested that hosting the World Cup in countries with established soccer cultures would be more sustainable.
Seth Warren Rose, from the Eneref Institute, raised concerns about the escalating climate crisis and urged organizers to prioritize emission reduction efforts. He emphasized the need to adapt to a rapidly changing climate and warned against exacerbating global warming with large-scale events like the World Cup. Rose’s message to event organizers was clear: take meaningful steps to reduce emissions or reconsider hosting the tournament altogether.
The reliance on concrete in Saudi Arabia’s construction plans is a significant concern, as concrete production contributes to a considerable portion of global emissions. Human rights organizations have also expressed worries about the welfare of migrant workers involved in these projects. Despite some sustainability initiatives outlined in Saudi Arabia’s bid, such as using clean energy sources and implementing green building standards, experts like Karim Elgendy from Chatham House believe that the sheer magnitude of the planned developments could make the 2034 World Cup the most carbon-intensive one to date.
Critics advocating for a different host country, such as the UK with its existing stadium infrastructure, are countered by Walker Ross, a sport ecology researcher at the University of Edinburgh. Ross highlights the unique aspects of the Saudi bid and underscores the need for careful mitigation strategies to minimize the event’s environmental footprint. Ultimately, the decisions made regarding sustainability measures will determine the long-term impact of the 2034 World Cup on the environment.
In a bid to spread the excitement of the World Cup to fans across the globe, FIFA’s decision to host upcoming tournaments in multiple cities and countries has raised concerns about the environmental impact of such widespread events. With the 2026 World Cup set to take place in 16 cities across North America and the 2030 edition planned across six countries, environmental experts are highlighting the potential carbon footprint of these grand sporting spectacles.
Critics argue that FIFA’s bid process is at the heart of the issue, as it encourages expansive infrastructure development and extensive travel for teams and supporters. Despite the allure of showcasing the tournament in various locations, the environmental repercussions cannot be overlooked. Ross, a vocal proponent of sustainable practices, pointed fingers at FIFA for failing to prioritize environmental considerations in the selection of host countries.
The 2022 World Cup hosted in Qatar serves as a pertinent example of the environmental challenges associated with mega sporting events. The country embarked on a massive construction endeavor, investing billions in building stadiums, transportation systems, and urban infrastructure. However, the environmental cost of these developments was steep, with projections estimating a substantial carbon footprint equivalent to 3% of Qatar’s total emissions in 2019.
While Qatar touted its World Cup as ‘carbon neutral,’ experts have raised doubts about the accuracy of such claims, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessments of environmental impacts. In stark contrast, the organizers of the upcoming Paris Olympics have demonstrated a commitment to sustainability by significantly reducing the carbon footprint of the games through the adoption of renewable energy sources, eco-friendly materials, and low-carbon food options.
Looking ahead, Saudi Arabia’s bid for hosting future FIFA events has come under scrutiny due to its rising carbon emissions and heavy reliance on fossil fuels. The country’s ambitious plans for sustainable energy sources aim to mitigate environmental concerns, but questions remain about the feasibility of achieving these targets amid ongoing fossil fuel expansion.
FIFA, in evaluating Saudi Arabia’s bid, acknowledged the potential environmental challenges posed by extensive construction activities while expressing optimism about the proposed mitigation measures. The organization’s emphasis on sustainability signals a growing recognition of the need to address environmental issues in the planning and execution of major sporting events.
As the world grapples with the urgency of climate action, the intersection of sports and sustainability presents a crucial opportunity to drive positive change. By embracing eco-conscious practices, such as reducing carbon emissions, promoting renewable energy, and prioritizing environmental stewardship, sporting events can not only captivate audiences but also inspire meaningful progress towards a more sustainable future.
For more in-depth coverage of climate and environmental issues, visit http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment. The Associated Press remains committed to providing objective and insightful reporting on critical global challenges, with support from various private foundations. AP upholds the highest journalistic standards in all its content, maintaining transparency in collaborations with philanthropic partners.
