Unveiling the Secret Motives Behind Political Tariffs
Negotiations and business planning can be complicated by conflicting rationales. For instance, a country targeted by punitive tariffs from Trump might come to the negotiating table seeking to resolve conflicts, as seen with Canada and Mexico working to reduce the influx of fentanyl and undocumented immigrants into the United States. However, if Trump resorts to broad tariffs to generate revenue and reciprocal tariffs to balance trade, Mexico and Canada could still face tariffs. Despite debatable reasoning, there is a logic behind Trump’s tariffs.
With America facing a substantial budget deficit, Trump aims to make up for lost revenue through tariffs, particularly following his 2017 tax cuts that he intends to extend and expand. Trump has claimed that his tariffs will potentially bring in billions, even trillions of dollars to the US Treasury. Criticizing American trade policy for allegedly subsidizing foreign nations, Trump emphasizes the trade gap, the disparity between US exports and imports. While some economists argue that Trump’s portrayal of the trade gap is unfair, reciprocal tariffs matching those of other countries are intended to balance trade.
Trump also threatens tariffs to pressure countries into concessions he deems beneficial for America, such as reducing undocumented immigration and fentanyl trafficking. By discouraging buyers from purchasing goods from tariffed countries, tariffs can adversely affect those nations’ economies, prompting some to seek agreements to avoid tariffs. Trump considers tariffs a versatile tool to achieve various objectives, ranking it as the fourth-most beautiful word in the dictionary.
However, the challenge lies in simultaneously achieving all three goals. Compliance with Trump’s demands to avoid tariffs hampers revenue generation for the United States. Conversely, imposing tariffs without incentives for negotiation undermines diplomatic efforts. Moreover, implementing tariffs to balance trade has resulted in retaliatory measures, potentially sparking harmful trade conflicts.
Recent developments include Trump’s imposition of a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports alongside existing tariffs on China. In response, China retaliated with tariffs on specific products and initiated investigations, reflecting the escalating trade tensions.
The Rand appears on its unreliable entities list. However, Trump has already initiated the process of reducing these tariffs. He has decided to temporarily halt taxes on goods valued at $800 or less that are being imported into the United States until the Commerce Department establishes a mechanism for taxing those difficult-to-track items. Furthermore, Trump has also suspended the imposition of 25% across-the-board tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, at least until March 1.
During a conversation with reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump revealed his intention to announce a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports into the country on Monday. The global market has been inundated with inexpensive steel from China, negatively impacting production worldwide, including in the United States, albeit indirectly. The steel tariffs implemented during Trump’s first administration led to increased domestic hiring and production, alongside rising prices.
Trump also disclosed that he plans to conduct a separate news conference on Tuesday or Wednesday to unveil extensive new reciprocal tariffs, potentially matching the tariffs imposed by other countries on American goods dollar-for-dollar. In his words, “Very simply, it’s if they charge us, we charge them.”
Apart from the universal 10% tariff on all imports and the European Union’s threats, Trump has hinted previously about using tariffs as leverage to persuade Denmark to grant the United States control over Greenland. However, he has not divulged specific details regarding the scope of the new tariffs or their potential implementation dates.
To access more CNN news and newsletters, you can create an account on CNN.com.
