On April 17, 2025, the John Harvard Statue at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts was pictured beneath an American flag. The Trump Administration has intensified its pressure on Harvard University by announcing a suspension of federal research grants to the institution. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon stated that Harvard should no longer expect federal funding and should instead rely on its substantial endowment and alumni donations. This action is part of a broader effort by the Administration to reform higher education and penalize institutions that do not comply.
The Administration’s demands include the elimination of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, changes to leadership and hiring practices, and adherence to new regulations on student conduct and faculty oversight. In response, Harvard has filed a lawsuit against the Administration, asserting its independence and constitutional rights. However, Columbia University, faced with similar threats, chose to comply with the Administration’s demands to maintain its federal funding.
The conflict between Harvard and the Trump Administration has unfolded over several key events. In March, a review of Harvard’s federal contracts and grants was initiated to ensure compliance with civil rights obligations. Subsequently, in April, Harvard received a letter outlining the conditions it needed to meet to continue its financial relationship with the federal government. These conditions included implementing leadership reforms, changing hiring practices, promoting viewpoint diversity, and discontinuing diversity programs. Harvard was also instructed to revise its student discipline policies and cooperate with federal agencies.
The situation between Harvard and the Trump Administration reflects a broader struggle over the direction and governance of higher education institutions.
On April 14, Harvard responded to the Administration’s demands by rejecting them, stating that they exceed legal boundaries. The university expressed willingness to engage in dialogue regarding actions taken and planned to enhance the community’s experience. However, Harvard emphasized that it cannot agree to demands beyond the lawful authority of any administration, as stated by its attorneys.
Subsequently, on April 16, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) threatened Harvard’s enrollment of international students. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem disclosed the cancellation of two grants totaling over $2.7 million to Harvard and cautioned that the university could lose the privilege to enroll international students, who accounted for 27.2% of the student body in the 2024-2025 academic year.
On April 21, Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration, alleging violations of the First Amendment and irregularities in cutting grant funding. The legal action aimed to protect Harvard’s autonomy and critical research initiatives.
Harvard joined other colleges on April 22 in a joint letter condemning ‘government intrusion’ in higher education. The American Association of Colleges and Universities criticized what they described as unprecedented government overreach and political interference jeopardizing academic institutions in the U.S. Harvard President Alan Garber and 611 other higher education leaders signed the letter, advocating for institutional independence in educational matters.
Subsequently, on May 2, President Trump announced plans to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status, asserting it as a deserved action through his social media platform. Harvard refuted this decision, stating there was no legal basis for such action.
On May 7, Harvard was informed by Sec. McMahon that it would lose access to new federal research grants due to alleged noncompliance with federal laws.
For more information, please contact us at letters@time.com.
