The clash among industry giants has escalated to a personal and costly battle for the future of AI. CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, publicly criticized rival Elon Musk a day after turning down a lucrative deal that could potentially shape the course of artificial intelligence. Despite a substantial offer to purchase his company, Altman rebuffed the Elon Musk-led consortium, asserting that the ChatGPT creator is not up for sale.
In an interview at the Paris AI Action Summit, Altman expressed his views on Musk’s recent actions, stating, “Elon tries various tactics over an extended period. This seems to be the latest episode of the week. I believe he is attempting to impede our progress.” Musk revealed his leadership of a group of investors who proposed a $97.4 billion acquisition of OpenAI on Monday. While the OpenAI board must consider this significant offer, uncertainties loom regarding potential deviations from the company’s core mission under Musk’s direction.
The proposed acquisition could complicate OpenAI’s restructuring plans and substantially raise the stakes. Musk, a former co-founder of OpenAI who parted ways with the company, has engaged in prolonged disputes with Altman, launching multiple legal challenges against OpenAI and its leadership. Musk alleges that OpenAI, purportedly a philanthropic entity, deviated from its founding principles by pursuing profit with its AI technologies.
With Musk now a direct competitor through his AI venture x.AI, Altman expressed his dissatisfaction with Musk’s confrontational tactics, emphasizing the need for healthy competition based on product development. Altman insinuated that Musk’s actions stem from insecurities, remarking sympathetically on Musk’s demeanor.
The ongoing feud between Musk and Altman dates back to legal battles initiated by Musk in 2024, which have since involved mutual accusations and counterclaims. The discord between the two influential figures in the tech industry shows no signs of abating, as they navigate the complex landscape of AI development and corporate rivalry.
Expressing jealousy that he was no longer a part of the startup, he departed from OpenAI in 2018 after failing to persuade his co-founders to allow Tesla to acquire the company. Altman refuted Musk’s claim that OpenAI was straying from its nonprofit origins, despite efforts to establish its for-profit arm for greater flexibility. “We are not transitioning to a for-profit model,” Altman clarified. “We are exploring various options for the next phase, but the nonprofit will remain crucial, steering the mission and persisting. The board is evaluating different structures, but the nonprofit’s significance will endure.”
However, the substantial $100 billion proposition from Musk and his associates could disrupt OpenAI’s strategies. To establish the for-profit division, the nonprofit may retain a stake and must determine the deal’s value. If Musk’s offer is valid (which is likely, given his status as the wealthiest individual), OpenAI may need to demonstrate that its proposal better assesses the company’s worth. Essentially, Musk has set a minimum value of $97.4 billion for the deal.
Nonetheless, the situation is complex. As a nonprofit, OpenAI is not obligated to prioritize financial returns and could argue that Musk’s involvement might compromise the company’s safety-focused mission. The path forward for the world’s leading AI company is now considerably more challenging.
To access more CNN news and newsletters, visit CNN.com and create an account.
