The US Supreme Court has issued a noteworthy ruling mandating a fresh trial for Richard Glossip, an individual facing a death sentence in Oklahoma. In a 5-3 decision, the court sided with Glossip, overturning a previous ruling by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals. This development follows the unusual alliance formed between Oklahoma’s Republican attorney general and Glossip in advocating for a retrial.
Glossip, currently 62 years old, was found guilty of the 1997 murder of the proprietor of an Oklahoma City motel where he was employed. Over the years, he has experienced the postponement of nine scheduled execution dates and has had the somber experience of partaking in his “last meal” on three separate occasions.
In an opinion delivered for the court on Tuesday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed that “We conclude that the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony.” Joining her in the majority opinion were liberal justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, as well as conservative justices Brett Kavanaugh and Chief Justice John Roberts. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, another conservative, concurred with the opinion but suggested sending the case back for further proceedings. Notably, Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate in the case.
Don Knight, the attorney representing Glossip, hailed the court’s decision as “a triumph for justice and equity within our legal system.” Knight expressed optimism that Glossip will finally have the opportunity to receive a fair trial, a chance that has long eluded him. The next steps in the case will be determined by prosecutors in Oklahoma.
Maintaining his innocence steadfastly for 27 years, Glossip has consistently denied involvement in the murder of his boss, Barry Van Treese, the owner of the Best Budget Inn motel in Oklahoma City, who was brutally beaten to death with a baseball bat in 1997. Glossip’s coworker, Justin Sneed, was convicted of the homicide and alleged that Glossip had instructed him to carry out the killing. Sneed, who confessed to the murder, escaped execution by implicating Glossip in exchange for a reduced sentence, claiming that Glossip had paid him $10,000 to commit the crime.
Although Glossip acknowledged assisting Sneed in concealing the murder post-incident, he vehemently denied being aware of any plan to harm Van Treese. Revelations subsequently emerged that prosecutors had failed to disclose vital information regarding Sneed, specifically his history of substance abuse and treatment for a severe psychiatric ailment.
Justice Sotomayor emphasized, “Had the prosecution corrected Sneed on the stand, his credibility plainly would have suffered.” This oversight, she noted, would have exposed Sneed’s unreliability and deceitfulness under oath to the jury. Glossip’s legal journey began with a conviction in 1998, which was later overturned in 2001, only for him to be convicted again three years thereafter.
In
