Police apologize for their investigation into a Newcastle United fan who was banned by the football club for sharing gender-critical views on social media. Northumbria Police informed Linzi Smith that certain aspects of their inquiry into allegations of a hate crime against her were unacceptable. Although no misconduct was found among their officers, they acknowledged the need for additional training on handling cases like hers in the future.
Ms. Smith, a 34-year-old advocate for lesbian, bisexual, and women’s rights, was accused of being transphobic by someone who informed Newcastle United that transgender individuals would not feel safe near her. This stemmed from Ms. Smith’s tweets questioning transgender activism and suggesting that it was homophobic. Following a police interview under caution, where she felt pressured and vulnerable, Ms. Smith was relieved to learn that no further action would be taken. However, a letter from the police indicated that the investigation could still be ongoing, causing her distress.
Feeling targeted and humiliated throughout the investigation due to her gender-critical beliefs, Ms. Smith filed a complaint against Northumbria Police. She expressed feeling stalked and intimidated by the officers’ actions. The force has since apologized to Ms. Smith for the impact of the events on her personal life. They acknowledged the inappropriate mention of a “hypothetical victim” during the interview, as there was no actual victim involved in the case.
Ms. Smith stated that Newcastle United suspended her membership based on the police investigation, although the force clarified that they did not influence the club’s decision. The police recognized the distress caused to Ms. Smith and expressed regret for the situation she experienced.
The concept of a victim is central to the understanding of a crime, yet in the case of Malicious Communication, the absence of a victim complicates the matter. Northumbria Police’s handling of the situation was criticized, with the force acknowledging that officers failed to properly assess the need for an investigation before proceeding to caution Ms. Smith. This oversight was attributed to a lack of consideration of the necessary elements to establish a crime, which was identified as a recurring issue in the handling of Ms. Smith’s case.
The force recognized a growing trend of complaints stemming from individuals taking offense to the expression of differing opinions, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced training of officers in addressing such incidents. The need for a more rigorous evaluation of evidence before categorizing an incident as a crime was underscored throughout the allocation and investigative processes.
Despite Northumbria Police’s acknowledgment of shortcomings, Ms. Smith expressed a sense of betrayal and fear resulting from the repeated failures in handling her case. While she found elements of validation in the report, particularly in relation to her stance on gender ideology, the overall experience left her feeling disappointed and apprehensive about the systemic errors that led to her ordeal.
Lord Young, from the Free Speech Union, an organization supporting Ms. Smith, condemned the investigation as an infringement on free speech. He highlighted the absurdity of treating an expression of opinion as a hate crime, calling attention to the unjust ban imposed by Newcastle United. Welcoming the police’s admission of error and apology, Lord Young urged the club to lift the ban, asserting that individuals should not face repercussions for holding legitimate viewpoints shared by the majority of fans.
Discover new perspectives through the exceptional journalism of The Telegraph. Enjoy a complimentary one-month subscription with unlimited access to our acclaimed website, exclusive app features, special offers, and more.
