President Donald Trump, just over 100 days into his presidency, raised doubts about his obligation to uphold the Constitution and the Fifth Amendment’s due process rights. In an interview with NBC News’ “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker, Trump hesitated when asked about citizens and noncitizens having the right to due process, stating he was not a lawyer and unsure of the answer. Despite Welker pointing out the protections outlined in the Fifth Amendment, Trump expressed frustration over potential legal challenges hampering his mass deportation efforts. When pressed on whether he needed to uphold the Constitution as president, Trump evaded the question, deferring to his legal team and claiming they would follow the Supreme Court’s guidance. Legal experts emphasized that the Fifth Amendment extends due process rights to all individuals, including illegal immigrants, a principle affirmed by Justice Scalia. Trump’s reluctance to acknowledge his duty to uphold the Constitution was criticized as unprecedented, with past presidents recognizing this responsibility regardless of their legal background. Trump’s oath of office, taken on January 20, included a commitment to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, a pledge that some observers argue he has not fully embraced in his interactions with the judiciary.
President Trump expressed the need for immigration judges who will not challenge his deportation plan, stating that trials for every single illegal immigrant are not practical due to the large number of individuals involved. Immigration matters are typically addressed through limited hearings or court proceedings before immigration judges who are part of the Department of Justice. Critics, including Democrats and Republicans, raised concerns about Trump’s comments, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional boundaries and due process for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. The notion of the government acting as the sole authority without oversight or accountability was strongly criticized, with experts emphasizing the fundamental principles of a constitutional republic.
