The report revealed that among the crowd, there were a total of 26 confidential human sources, out of which only three were assigned by the FBI to be present. This information was brought up by Smith on “The Stephen A. Smith Show,” where he expressed frustration over Democrats distorting facts.
Smith criticized the Democrats for constantly misleading the public, stating, “The big issue is I’m really, really sick and tired of every time I turn around, I’m finding something else that the Democrats have lied about or downplayed or misrepresented along the way.” His discontent with the political party’s actions was evident as he voiced his concerns on the show.
Expressing his growing frustration, Smith mentioned that he was “really getting ticked off” by the Republicans appearing to be correct when they criticized their Democrat counterparts. He highlighted the ongoing political discourse, emphasizing that while debates on policies and politics are common, the Democrats were working diligently to paint the right with negative traits such as corruption, deceit, and hypocrisy. However, Smith pointed out that some Democrats were also guilty of similar behavior, leading to a cycle of accusations and revelations that left him feeling exasperated.
Furthermore, Smith highlighted how the Democrats’ actions inadvertently made former President Donald Trump seem more credible in comparison. This observation underscored the impact of the Democrats’ behavior on public perception and the political landscape.
Horowitz, a key figure in the investigation, clarified that none of the sources were encouraged or sanctioned by the FBI to enter restricted areas like the Capitol or engage in illegal activities. Out of the 26 confidential human sources present during the events of January 6, 23 had independently traveled to Washington, D.C., with three of them breaching the Capitol during the riot and an additional 11 entering restricted areas around the Capitol.
Despite the presence of confidential human sources, Horowitz confirmed that there was no evidence suggesting that undercover FBI employees were among the protest crowds or at the Capitol during the events of January 6. This clarification aimed to dispel any misconceptions regarding the FBI’s involvement in the situation.
The release of the report coincided with FBI Director Christopher Wray’s announcement of his impending departure from his role before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration. This transition added another layer of complexity to an already contentious political environment.
In a separate development, Trump hinted at his intention to pardon individuals involved in the January 6 riot on his first day back in office. This statement raised concerns and further fueled debates surrounding accountability and justice in the aftermath of the events.
Smith’s impassioned commentary on the political landscape and the revelations from the report shed light on the complexities and challenges facing the nation. As he dissected the implications of the DOJ IG’s findings on FBI informants, Smith’s words resonated with a sense of frustration and disillusionment with the political dynamics at play.
