WASHINGTON (AP) — The Institute of Education Sciences, a federal agency responsible for tracking the academic progress of students in the United States, is facing budget cuts of nearly $900 million following a review by the Department of Government Efficiency led by Elon Musk. The review deemed much of the agency’s work unnecessary, leading to the termination of numerous contracts and raising questions about the future of the institute.
Approximately 169 contracts were abruptly terminated, impacting critical research programs such as long-term student studies, strategies for teaching elementary school reading, and support services for youth with disabilities. The cuts have sparked concerns among education advocates, who fear that the accountability of the education system may be compromised, particularly in addressing achievement gaps among low-income and minority students.
Despite these reductions, certain key initiatives like the NAEP assessment and the College Scorecard are expected to remain operational, according to Education Department spokesperson Madison Biedermann. However, the abrupt nature of the cuts has been met with criticism from industry groups, with Rachel Dinkes of the Knowledge Alliance describing the actions as counterproductive and damaging to efforts aimed at improving student outcomes.
The Department of Government Efficiency’s influence over the Education Department was recently curtailed when a court temporarily blocked access to sensitive internal systems following a legal challenge. The cuts at the Institute of Education Sciences encompass a wide range of projects, including academic studies, international participation, and mandated research by Congress.
The termination of contracts, totaling nearly $881 million, has raised questions about the future direction of education monitoring in the United States. The Institute of Education Sciences plays a crucial role in evaluating federal programs and informing decision-making at educational institutions nationwide. The impact of these budget cuts on the quality of education research and student outcomes remains a point of concern among stakeholders in the education community.
Lack of progress in reading skills and minimal improvement in math have been observed among students in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Activate Research, a small business focused on ensuring accuracy and objectivity in reports, has suffered significant setbacks, losing four contracts and considering laying off at least 20 out of its 28 employees. Founder Dinah Sparks emphasized the value of the company’s work, reassuring the team that their contributions were not in vain.
Another small business tasked with gathering essential data on schools also faced contract cancellations, leading to layoffs. Efforts by Congress to support education research, including providing around $800 million to the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), were highlighted. Calls for reinstating contracts were made by prominent research associations, underscoring the critical role of IES in generating important insights on school finances and student outcomes.
The impact of the funding cuts on educational research and data analysis was a cause for concern, with experts emphasizing the detrimental effects on student learning and development. The work of IES in addressing educational disparities and driving improvements in education outcomes was recognized by various stakeholders. Former IES commissioner Mark Schneider urged the new administration to seize the opportunity to revamp outdated programs rather than abruptly cutting funding.
Democratic Sen. Patty Murray criticized the cuts as undermining the vital research functions of the Department of Education, warning against jeopardizing the quality of education through budget reductions. The potential implications of President Trump’s proposal to dismantle the Education Department and transfer authority to states and schools were also discussed.
The future of education research funding and the need for continued support for research initiatives remained uncertain, with concerns raised about the potential consequences of abrupt funding cuts on the education sector.
It is the responsibility of AP to oversee all content. To discover AP’s guidelines for collaborating with philanthropic organizations, as well as a roster of supporters and the coverage areas they have funded, visit AP.org.
