Democratic AGs Challenge Trump’s Bid to Scrap Birthright Citizenship!

Democratic attorneys general took a bold stand on Tuesday as they filed lawsuits in Massachusetts and Washington state challenging President Donald Trump’s recent attempt to curtail automatic birthright citizenship. The move comes in response to Trump signing an executive order on Monday, aiming to restrict birthright citizenship to individuals with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or a permanent resident.

Facing staunch opposition from both the 23 Democratic attorneys general and civil rights groups, the proposal is set for a contentious legal battle. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong minced no words, denouncing the president’s actions as a “war on American families” and a blatant disregard for the Constitution. Tong, alongside 18 other attorneys general, lodged their lawsuit in federal court in Massachusetts, while four states—Washington, Arizona, Oregon, and Illinois—initiated a separate legal challenge.

The Massachusetts lawsuit deems Trump’s plan as a “flagrantly unlawful attempt” to strip citizenship from countless American-born children solely based on their parentage. According to the lawsuit filed in Washington, the states stand to face “immediate and irreparable harm” should the measure be enforced, affecting thousands of individuals. The lawsuit warns that approximately 12,000 babies born each month nationwide could be denied U.S. citizenship under the proposed changes.

At the heart of the legal battle lies the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which unequivocally guarantees birthright citizenship to anyone born on American soil, with few exceptions such as the children of diplomats. Trump’s executive order, if implemented, would challenge this longstanding constitutional principle, setting the stage for a clash between the executive branch and the judiciary.

Despite Trump’s proposal not taking effect for a month, legal experts anticipate swift action from the courts to prevent its enforcement. The lawsuits were strategically filed in federal courts within the jurisdiction of appeals courts primarily composed of judges appointed by Democratic administrations. This move reflects a strategic legal maneuver to counter the administration’s controversial interpretation of birthright citizenship.

The legal battleground harkens back to a pivotal Supreme Court ruling in 1898, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, which affirmed the citizenship of an individual born in San Francisco to Chinese parents. The court’s precedent upheld the principle of birthright citizenship for individuals born in the U.S., regardless of their parents’ nationality. Legal scholars believe that despite the current conservative majority on the Supreme Court, including three justices appointed by Trump, the court is likely to uphold the established interpretation of birthright citizenship.

As the legal showdown unfolds, the nation watches with bated breath to see how the courts will navigate the delicate balance between executive authority and constitutional rights. The outcome of these lawsuits could have far-reaching implications for the interpretation of birthright citizenship and the limits of presidential power. Amidst the legal wrangling, the core principles of American democracy hang in the balance, awaiting a definitive judicial verdict.

Author

Recommended news

Texas GOP Rep. Kay Granger Faces Health Challenges in Final Months of Congress!

FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) — Veteran Republican U.S. Representative Kay Granger of Texas is currently facing unexpected health challenges...
- Advertisement -spot_img